(I think that the blog entry below is from September 19, 2015.)
As I mentioned in the book, I am referring to myself, if anyone, when using
the word ‘stupid’ in the title of the book (It’s Velocity, Stupid! Is the
Velocity of Money the Forgotten Variable of Macroeconomics?). I should
have been more aware earlier that maintaining greater levels of the velocity of
money was a missing ingredient (perhaps the missing ingredient) from
the U.S. economic recovery following the Great Recession. Large increases in
the M1 money supply, combined with comparatively small increases in GDP
spending, have driven M1 money velocity down by more than forty per cent in the
United States after the fourth quarter, as shown in data on www.economagic.com
and elsewhere.
Despite the M1 money supply more than doubling after December 2007,
inflation in the GDP deflator has remained relatively low. With low inflation
and relatively slow growth in real GDP, the increase in spending sought by
policymakers has not fully materialized. This shows up clearly in the plunge in
M1 velocity in the U.S. Will inflation remain low the U.S. if the velocity of
money does not increase much further? Will the economic recovery continue to be
sluggish without greater money velocity?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A DIFFICULT DECISION FOR THE FED
The Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed) has a new chair recently approved by the US Senate of the US Congress. The new chair, Kevin Warsh, an...
-
( I believe the blog post below is from April 29, 2015. ) Earlier today, CNBC and likely others announced that the initial estimate fo...
-
( I think that the blog post below is from December 24, 2017. ) Happy Holidays everyone!
-
( I believe that the blog post below is from May 13, 2015. ) Earlier today, CNBC and others reported that estimated U.S. retail sales ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.